top of page

Stryker Hip Implant Recall Litigation South Carolina

 

Stryker Orthopedics released the Rejuvenate and ABG II modular hip methods in February of 2010 as lasting, all-alloy alternatives to conventional plastic hips. In just over two years, the apparatus were used in about 20,000 patients undergoing hip replacement procedures.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It's possible that you may have a Stryker hip implant part even if you didn't receive Stryker hip recall news out of your doctor. You should see your doctor straight away if you're encountering some of the hints of adverse side effects. Nonetheless, even if you are not experiencing symptoms now, it's very important to get evaluated as some side effects may take time to show. Contact a Stryker hip implant recall lawyer at our firm to get more Stryker hip info and to understand your legal rights.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Stryker Rejuvenate hip implant is different from other hip-replacement devices in the news regarding lawsuits because it isn't a steel-on-metal hip-replacement apparatus. Instead, the Rejuvenate hip replacement device, which works on the ceramic component, was meant instead to the metal-on-steel products. It was advertised to younger patients as a modular hip-replacement, meaning the parts were custom made to fit patients better, which was supposed to result in more-lasting hip replacement apparatus that offered a much better range of movement. Stryker Rejuvenate Hip Problems

 

In case you are interested visit our web site http://www.strykerlawsuit.org/abg-ii-recall/

These claims are just what've resulted in the current stryker hip lawsuit nevertheless. In June of 2012, the company issued a recall notice on its merchandise Rejuvenate and ABG II. The company stated the metallic components in the replacements weren't durable enough and were susceptible to corrosion which caused more discomfort and restricted mobility. Independent research also revealed that these spare parts were not as permanent as promised, and caused people to experience internal bleeding and an additional reduction of bone mass and tissue damage.

 

 

New Jersey striker suits are becoming numerous enough to be centralized. Stryker Hip-Replacement Litigation filed a growth in how many patients, as a proposal to reinforce the standing of state actions was filed with the New-Jersey Supreme Court. The Honorable Carol E. Higbee in Atlantic County court for centralization consented in March 2009. On the other hand, the court stopped short of designating mass tort litigation as. Model Stryker Trident hip recall suits follow between 2005-2007, Stryker Trident hip replacement parts for them to obtain a lot of grievances regarding began. Patients suffering pain and instability, and via their implants strange squeaking sounds were reported.

Our page

bottom of page